AI Trend Notifier
EN

$ diff astra kimi-k3

Astra vs Kimi K3

Values come from Astra and Kimi K3, where each is cited to its source. This page states no benchmark result and ranks neither model — it puts two published specifications next to each other. Where a lab has not published a figure, the row says so rather than guessing.

What actually differs

Context window
Astra takes 1.1M against 1M — modestly more room in a single request.
Input price
Kimi K3 at $3/M against $10/M — 3.3× cheaper to feed. Standard rates: one of these labs also quotes a lower cached-input tier, which applies only when a prefix is reused — see the full spec below.
Output price
Kimi K3 at $15/M against $50/M — 3.3× cheaper to generate. Output dominates the bill on most agentic workloads, where the model writes far more than it reads.
Weights
Kimi K3 publishes weights (Modified MIT (commercial use permitted; weights publicly downloadable)); Astra is API-only. That decides self-hosting, air-gapped deployment and fine-tuning before any capability question does.
Recency
Astra shipped 49 days after Kimi K3 (2026-09-03 vs 2026-07-16).

Full spec

AttributeAstraKimi K3
DeveloperOpenAIMoonshot AI
Released2026-09-032026-07-16
Context window1,050,000 tokens (128,000 max output)1M tokens
Pricing$10/M input · $50/M output$0.30/M cache-hit input · $3.00/M cache-miss input · $15.00/M output
LicenseproprietaryModified MIT (commercial use permitted; weights publicly downloadable)
AvailabilityChatGPT Plus, Pro, Business, Enterprise · OpenAI API · AWS — staged, see belowKimi Code, Kimi app, Kimi API; weights on Hugging Face (`moonshot-ai/kimi-k3`, released 2026-07-27)

How these pages are produced

← all comparisons