$ diff mimo-v2-6-pro ternary-bonsai-2-27b
MiMo-V2.6-Pro vs Ternary Bonsai 2 27B
Values come from MiMo-V2.6-Pro and Ternary Bonsai 2 27B, where each is cited to its source. This page states no benchmark result and ranks neither model — it puts two published specifications next to each other. Where a lab has not published a figure, the row says so rather than guessing.
XiaomiMiMo-V2.6-Pro
- context
- 1M
- weights
- open
- $/M in
- $0.435
- $/M out
- $0.87
- context
- 262K
- weights
- open
- $/M in
- —
- $/M out
- —
What actually differs
- Context window
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro takes 1M against 262K — 3.8× more room in a single request.
- Weights
- Both publish weights — MiMo-V2.6-Pro under MIT (open weights), Ternary Bonsai 2 27B under Apache 2.0. Check the licences rather than assuming they permit the same commercial use.
- Recency
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro shipped 5 days after Ternary Bonsai 2 27B (2026-09-22 vs 2026-09-17).
Full spec
| Attribute | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Ternary Bonsai 2 27B |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | Xiaomi | Prismml |
| Released | 2026-09-22 | 2026-09-17 |
| Context window | 1M tokens | 262,144 |
| Pricing | no vendor list price — weights are MIT and self-hostable; routed providers reported at $0.435/M input · $0.87/M output | not recorded |
| License | MIT (open weights) | Apache 2.0 |
| Availability | Hugging Face as `XiaomiMiMo/MiMo-V2.6-Pro-RL`; hosted via third-party routers | Hugging Face (`prism-ml/Ternary-Bonsai-2-27B-gguf`, `prism-ml/Ternary-Bonsai-2-27B-mlx-2bit`) |