AI Trend Notifier
EN한

$ diff mistral-large-4 longcat-2-0

Mistral Large 4 vs LongCat-2.0

Values come from Mistral Large 4 and LongCat-2.0, where each is cited to its source. This page states no benchmark result and ranks neither model — it puts two published specifications next to each other. Where a lab has not published a figure, the row says so rather than guessing.

What actually differs

Context window
Identical — both accept 1M tokens, so context length is not a reason to pick either.
Input price
LongCat-2.0 at $0.3/M against $1.36/M — 4.5× cheaper to feed. Standard rates: one of these labs also quotes a lower cached-input tier, which applies only when a prefix is reused — see the full spec below.
Output price
LongCat-2.0 at $1.2/M against $4.18/M — 3.5× cheaper to generate. Output dominates the bill on most agentic workloads, where the model writes far more than it reads.
Recency
Mistral Large 4 shipped 98 days after LongCat-2.0 (2026-10-06 vs 2026-06-30).

Full spec

AttributeMistral Large 4LongCat-2.0
DeveloperMistral AIMeituan
Released2026-10-062026-06-30
Context window1M1 million tokens (LongCat Sparse Attention / LSA)
Pricing$1.36/M input · $4.18/M output (announcement)$0.30/M input · $1.20/M output ($0.006/M cached input) — OpenRouter catalogue, read 2026-07-28. Open weights, so this is hosted-inference pricing rather than a licence fee.
Licensenot recordedMIT (commercially permissive)
AvailabilityMistral Studio API preview; weights promised by end of October 2026Open-sourced 2026-06-30; previously served on OpenRouter under the codename "Owl Alpha"

How these pages are produced

← all comparisons