$ diff mimo-v2-6-pro laguna-s-2-1
MiMo-V2.6-Pro vs Laguna S 2.1
Values come from MiMo-V2.6-Pro and Laguna S 2.1, where each is cited to its source. This page states no benchmark result and ranks neither model — it puts two published specifications next to each other. Where a lab has not published a figure, the row says so rather than guessing.
XiaomiMiMo-V2.6-Pro
- context
- 1M
- weights
- open
- $/M in
- $0.435
- $/M out
- $0.87
- context
- 1M
- weights
- open
- $/M in
- —
- $/M out
- —
What actually differs
- Context window
- Identical — both accept 1M tokens, so context length is not a reason to pick either.
- Weights
- Both publish weights — MiMo-V2.6-Pro under MIT (open weights), Laguna S 2.1 under OpenMDW-1.1 (open-weight). Check the licences rather than assuming they permit the same commercial use.
- Recency
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro shipped 63 days after Laguna S 2.1 (2026-09-22 vs 2026-07-21).
Full spec
| Attribute | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Laguna S 2.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | Xiaomi | Poolside |
| Released | 2026-09-22 | 2026-07-21 |
| Context window | 1M tokens | 1M |
| Pricing | no vendor list price — weights are MIT and self-hostable; routed providers reported at $0.435/M input · $0.87/M output | not recorded |
| License | MIT (open weights) | OpenMDW-1.1 (open-weight) |
| Availability | Hugging Face as `XiaomiMiMo/MiMo-V2.6-Pro-RL`; hosted via third-party routers | Hugging Face |