$ diff kimi-k3-1-pro mimo-v2-6-pro
Kimi K3.1 Pro vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro
Values come from Kimi K3.1 Pro and MiMo-V2.6-Pro, where each is cited to its source. This page states no benchmark result and ranks neither model — it puts two published specifications next to each other. Where a lab has not published a figure, the row says so rather than guessing.
Moonshot AIKimi K3.1 Pro
- context
- 1.0M
- weights
- —
- $/M in
- $2
- $/M out
- $10
- context
- 1M
- weights
- open
- $/M in
- $0.435
- $/M out
- $0.87
What actually differs
- Context window
- Kimi K3.1 Pro takes 1.0M against 1M — modestly more room in a single request.
- Input price
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro at $0.435/M against $2/M — 4.6× cheaper to feed. Standard rates: one of these labs also quotes a lower cached-input tier, which applies only when a prefix is reused — see the full spec below.
- Output price
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro at $0.87/M against $10/M — 11.5× cheaper to generate. Output dominates the bill on most agentic workloads, where the model writes far more than it reads.
- Recency
- Kimi K3.1 Pro shipped 31 days after MiMo-V2.6-Pro (2026-10-23 vs 2026-09-22).
Full spec
| Attribute | Kimi K3.1 Pro | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | Moonshot AI | Xiaomi |
| Released | 2026-10-23 | 2026-09-22 |
| Context window | 1,048,576 tokens ([source](../../sources/blogs/moonshot-2026-10-24-k3-pricing.md)) | 1M tokens |
| Pricing | $2.00/MTok input · $10.00/MTok output · $0.20/MTok cached input; cache writes $2.00/MTok (5m), $4.00/MTok (1h); excludes taxes ([source](../../sources/blogs/moonshot-2026-10-24-k3-pricing.md)) | no vendor list price — weights are MIT and self-hostable; routed providers reported at $0.435/M input · $0.87/M output |
| License | not recorded | MIT (open weights) |
| Availability | Kimi.ai, mobile apps, Kimi Work, Kimi Code, Kimi API; enterprise access off by default at launch ([source](../../sources/blogs/moonshot-2026-10-23-kimi-k3-1-pro.md)) | Hugging Face as `XiaomiMiMo/MiMo-V2.6-Pro-RL`; hosted via third-party routers |