$ diff mimo-v2-6-pro k2-horizon
MiMo-V2.6-Pro vs K2 Horizon
Values come from MiMo-V2.6-Pro and K2 Horizon, where each is cited to its source. This page states no benchmark result and ranks neither model — it puts two published specifications next to each other. Where a lab has not published a figure, the row says so rather than guessing.
XiaomiMiMo-V2.6-Pro
- context
- 1M
- weights
- open
- $/M in
- $0.435
- $/M out
- $0.87
- context
- 524K
- weights
- open
- $/M in
- —
- $/M out
- —
What actually differs
- Context window
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro takes 1M against 524K — modestly more room in a single request.
- Weights
- Both publish weights — MiMo-V2.6-Pro under MIT (open weights), K2 Horizon under Apache 2.0 (weights and code). Check the licences rather than assuming they permit the same commercial use.
- Recency
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro shipped 19 days after K2 Horizon (2026-09-22 vs 2026-09-03).
Full spec
| Attribute | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | K2 Horizon |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | Xiaomi | Ifm |
| Released | 2026-09-22 | 2026-09-03 |
| Context window | 1M tokens | 524,288 (flagship 375B-A23B, native from midtraining onward) |
| Pricing | no vendor list price — weights are MIT and self-hostable; routed providers reported at $0.435/M input · $0.87/M output | not recorded |
| License | MIT (open weights) | Apache 2.0 (weights and code) |
| Availability | Hugging Face as `XiaomiMiMo/MiMo-V2.6-Pro-RL`; hosted via third-party routers | Hugging Face (weights, code, checkpoints, training data where redistributable) |