AI Trend Notifier
EN

$ diff hy4-preview kimi-k3

Hy4 preview vs Kimi K3

Values come from Hy4 preview and Kimi K3, where each is cited to its source. This page states no benchmark result and ranks neither model — it puts two published specifications next to each other. Where a lab has not published a figure, the row says so rather than guessing.

What actually differs

Context window
Identical — both accept 1M tokens, so context length is not a reason to pick either.
Input price
Hy4 preview at $0.834/M against $3/M — 3.6× cheaper to feed. Standard rates: one of these labs also quotes a lower cached-input tier, which applies only when a prefix is reused — see the full spec below.
Output price
Hy4 preview at $2.501/M against $15/M — 6.0× cheaper to generate. Output dominates the bill on most agentic workloads, where the model writes far more than it reads.
Weights
Both publish weights — Hy4 preview under Apache-2.0, Kimi K3 under Modified MIT (commercial use permitted; weights publicly downloadable). Check the licences rather than assuming they permit the same commercial use.
Recency
Hy4 preview shipped 43 days after Kimi K3 (2026-08-28 vs 2026-07-16).

Full spec

AttributeHy4 previewKimi K3
DeveloperTencentMoonshot AI
Released2026-08-282026-07-16
Context windowover 1,000,0001M tokens
Pricing$0.834/M input · $2.501/M output$0.30/M cache-hit input · $3.00/M cache-miss input · $15.00/M output
LicenseApache-2.0Modified MIT (commercial use permitted; weights publicly downloadable)
AvailabilityHugging Face (BF16 + FP8), ModelScope, GitCode, CNB, Tencent Cloud TokenHub, OpenRouter, WorkBuddy, CodeBuddy, Yuanbao, imaKimi Code, Kimi app, Kimi API; weights on Hugging Face (`moonshot-ai/kimi-k3`, released 2026-07-27)

How these pages are produced

← all comparisons