$ diff grok-4-6 laguna-s-2-1
Grok 4.6 vs Laguna S 2.1
Values come from Grok 4.6 and Laguna S 2.1, where each is cited to its source. This page states no benchmark result and ranks neither model — it puts two published specifications next to each other. Where a lab has not published a figure, the row says so rather than guessing.
xAIGrok 4.6
- context
- 500K
- weights
- closed
- $/M in
- $2
- $/M out
- $6
- context
- 1M
- weights
- open
- $/M in
- —
- $/M out
- —
What actually differs
- Context window
- Laguna S 2.1 takes 1M against 500K — 2× more room in a single request.
- Weights
- Laguna S 2.1 publishes weights (OpenMDW-1.1 (open-weight)); Grok 4.6 is API-only. That decides self-hosting, air-gapped deployment and fine-tuning before any capability question does.
- Recency
- Grok 4.6 shipped 17 days after Laguna S 2.1 (2026-08-07 vs 2026-07-21).
Full spec
| Attribute | Grok 4.6 | Laguna S 2.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | xAI | Poolside |
| Released | 2026-08-07 | 2026-07-21 |
| Context window | 500,000 tokens | 1M |
| Pricing | $2/M input · $6/M output; a request reaching 200K tokens re-prices in full at $4.00/M input · $1.00/M cached input · $12.00/M output | not recorded |
| License | proprietary | OpenMDW-1.1 (open-weight) |
| Availability | API | Hugging Face |