AI Trend Notifier
EN

$ diff gpt-image-2-5-flare minimax-m3

GPT-Image-2.5 Flare vs MiniMax M3

Values come from GPT-Image-2.5 Flare and MiniMax M3, where each is cited to its source. This page states no benchmark result and ranks neither model — it puts two published specifications next to each other. Where a lab has not published a figure, the row says so rather than guessing.

What actually differs

Input price
MiniMax M3 at $0.3/M against $30/M — 100.0× cheaper to feed. Standard rates: one of these labs also quotes a lower cached-input tier, which applies only when a prefix is reused — see the full spec below.
Output price
MiniMax M3 at $1.2/M against $2/M — 1.7× cheaper to generate. Output dominates the bill on most agentic workloads, where the model writes far more than it reads.
Weights
MiniMax M3 publishes weights (Open-weight (HuggingFace)); GPT-Image-2.5 Flare is API-only. That decides self-hosting, air-gapped deployment and fine-tuning before any capability question does.
Recency
GPT-Image-2.5 Flare shipped 99 days after MiniMax M3 (2026-09-08 vs 2026-06-01).

Full spec

AttributeGPT-Image-2.5 FlareMiniMax M3
DeveloperOpenAIMiniMax
Released2026-09-082026-06-01
Context windownot recorded1,000,000 tokens (1M); min. 512K guaranteed
Pricingimage input $8.00/M tokens ($2.00/M cached) · image output $30.00/M tokens · text input $5.00/M tokens ($1.25/M cached)$0.30/M input · $1.20/M output ($0.06/M cached input) — OpenRouter catalogue, read 2026-07-28
LicenseproprietaryOpen-weight (HuggingFace)
AvailabilityOpenAI APIAPI (global, including English) + open-weight on HuggingFace

How these pages are produced

← all comparisons