$ diff gpt-6-1-sol mimo-v2-6-pro
GPT-6.1 Sol vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro
Values come from GPT-6.1 Sol and MiMo-V2.6-Pro, where each is cited to its source. This page states no benchmark result and ranks neither model — it puts two published specifications next to each other. Where a lab has not published a figure, the row says so rather than guessing.
OpenAIGPT-6.1 Sol
- context
- 1.1M
- weights
- closed
- $/M in
- $2
- $/M out
- $10
- context
- 1M
- weights
- open
- $/M in
- $0.435
- $/M out
- $0.87
What actually differs
- Context window
- GPT-6.1 Sol takes 1.1M against 1M — modestly more room in a single request.
- Input price
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro at $0.435/M against $2/M — 4.6× cheaper to feed. Standard rates: one of these labs also quotes a lower cached-input tier, which applies only when a prefix is reused — see the full spec below.
- Output price
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro at $0.87/M against $10/M — 11.5× cheaper to generate. Output dominates the bill on most agentic workloads, where the model writes far more than it reads.
- Weights
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro publishes weights (MIT (open weights)); GPT-6.1 Sol is API-only. That decides self-hosting, air-gapped deployment and fine-tuning before any capability question does.
- Recency
- GPT-6.1 Sol shipped 7 days after MiMo-V2.6-Pro (2026-09-29 vs 2026-09-22).
Full spec
| Attribute | GPT-6.1 Sol | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | OpenAI | Xiaomi |
| Released | 2026-09-29 | 2026-09-22 |
| Context window | 1.05M tokens | 1M tokens |
| Pricing | $2/M input · $10/M output · cached input $0.10/M | no vendor list price — weights are MIT and self-hostable; routed providers reported at $0.435/M input · $0.87/M output |
| License | proprietary (API-only; no weight release) | MIT (open weights) |
| Availability | OpenAI API; Codex; ChatGPT Work — surfaces named in reporting, not enumerated by a first-party page | Hugging Face as `XiaomiMiMo/MiMo-V2.6-Pro-RL`; hosted via third-party routers |