$ diff muse-glimmer glm-5-2
Muse Glimmer vs GLM-5.2
Values come from Muse Glimmer and GLM-5.2, where each is cited to its source. This page states no benchmark result and ranks neither model — it puts two published specifications next to each other. Where a lab has not published a figure, the row says so rather than guessing.
Meta AIMuse Glimmer
- context
- 131K
- weights
- open
- $/M in
- —
- $/M out
- —
- context
- 1M
- weights
- open
- $/M in
- $1.4
- $/M out
- $4.4
What actually differs
- Context window
- GLM-5.2 takes 1M against 131K — 7.6× more room in a single request.
- Weights
- Both publish weights — Muse Glimmer under Apache 2.0, GLM-5.2 under MIT (unrestricted, "no regional limits"). Check the licences rather than assuming they permit the same commercial use.
- Recency
- Muse Glimmer shipped 58 days after GLM-5.2 (2026-08-10 vs 2026-06-13).
Full spec
| Attribute | Muse Glimmer | GLM-5.2 |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | Meta AI | Z.ai |
| Released | 2026-08-10 | 2026-06-13 |
| Context window | 131,072 | 1,000,000 tokens |
| Pricing | not recorded | $1.40/M input · $4.40/M output — Z.ai's own endpoint on the OpenRouter catalogue, read 2026-08-01. Earlier revisions of this row quoted ≈$0.62–$0.77, which was not a price change: OpenRouter serves this model from 33 providers between $0.72 and $2.31 on input, and `/models` reports whichever one is routing at that instant. Four alerts in a day named $0.97, $1.19, $1.12 and $0.76 — Alibaba, SiliconFlow, an intermediate route, and StreamLake. Reseller quotes are real prices but they are not this model's price; quote the first-party figure, or quote a reseller with its name attached. |
| License | Apache 2.0 | MIT (unrestricted, "no regional limits") |
| Availability | Hugging Face (open weights), Ollama, LM Studio, vLLM, SGLang, Together AI, Fireworks AI, OpenRouter | GLM Coding Plan (highest subscription tier), standalone API, open weights, NVIDIA NIM hosted |