$ diff gemini-4-argon mimo-v2-6-pro
Gemini 4 Argon vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro
Values come from Gemini 4 Argon and MiMo-V2.6-Pro, where each is cited to its source. This page states no benchmark result and ranks neither model — it puts two published specifications next to each other. Where a lab has not published a figure, the row says so rather than guessing.
Google DeepMindGemini 4 Argon
- context
- 2M
- weights
- closed
- $/M in
- $2
- $/M out
- $10
- context
- 1M
- weights
- open
- $/M in
- $0.435
- $/M out
- $0.87
What actually differs
- Context window
- Gemini 4 Argon takes 2M against 1M — 2× more room in a single request.
- Input price
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro at $0.435/M against $2/M — 4.6× cheaper to feed. Standard rates: one of these labs also quotes a lower cached-input tier, which applies only when a prefix is reused — see the full spec below.
- Output price
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro at $0.87/M against $10/M — 11.5× cheaper to generate. Output dominates the bill on most agentic workloads, where the model writes far more than it reads.
- Weights
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro publishes weights (MIT (open weights)); Gemini 4 Argon is API-only. That decides self-hosting, air-gapped deployment and fine-tuning before any capability question does.
- Recency
- Gemini 4 Argon shipped 8 days after MiMo-V2.6-Pro (2026-09-30 vs 2026-09-22).
Full spec
| Attribute | Gemini 4 Argon | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | Google DeepMind | Xiaomi |
| Released | 2026-09-30 | 2026-09-22 |
| Context window | 2M tokens | 1M tokens |
| Pricing | $2/M input · $10/M output · cached input $0.10/M (introductory; stated to double to $4/$20) | no vendor list price — weights are MIT and self-hostable; routed providers reported at $0.435/M input · $0.87/M output |
| License | proprietary | MIT (open weights) |
| Availability | Fairwind Program (trusted cyber defenders) only; paid API and Google AI Ultra stated as next, no date | Hugging Face as `XiaomiMiMo/MiMo-V2.6-Pro-RL`; hosted via third-party routers |