$ diff mimo-v2-6-pro gemini-3-8-flash
MiMo-V2.6-Pro vs Gemini 3.8 Flash
Values come from MiMo-V2.6-Pro and Gemini 3.8 Flash, where each is cited to its source. This page states no benchmark result and ranks neither model — it puts two published specifications next to each other. Where a lab has not published a figure, the row says so rather than guessing.
XiaomiMiMo-V2.6-Pro
- context
- 1M
- weights
- open
- $/M in
- $0.435
- $/M out
- $0.87
- context
- 1.0M
- weights
- closed
- $/M in
- $0.75
- $/M out
- $3.75
What actually differs
- Context window
- Gemini 3.8 Flash takes 1.0M against 1M — modestly more room in a single request.
- Input price
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro at $0.435/M against $0.75/M — 1.7× cheaper to feed.
- Output price
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro at $0.87/M against $3.75/M — 4.3× cheaper to generate. Output dominates the bill on most agentic workloads, where the model writes far more than it reads.
- Weights
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro publishes weights (MIT (open weights)); Gemini 3.8 Flash is API-only. That decides self-hosting, air-gapped deployment and fine-tuning before any capability question does.
- Recency
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro shipped 20 days after Gemini 3.8 Flash (2026-09-22 vs 2026-09-02).
Full spec
| Attribute | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Gemini 3.8 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | Xiaomi | Google DeepMind |
| Released | 2026-09-22 | 2026-09-02 |
| Context window | 1M tokens | 1,048,576 tokens (65,536 max output) |
| Pricing | no vendor list price — weights are MIT and self-hostable; routed providers reported at $0.435/M input · $0.87/M output | $0.75/M input · $3.75/M output (introductory, through 2026-12-31) · $1.50/M · $7.50/M from 2027-01-01 |
| License | MIT (open weights) | proprietary |
| Availability | Hugging Face as `XiaomiMiMo/MiMo-V2.6-Pro-RL`; hosted via third-party routers | Gemini API, Google AI Studio, Antigravity, Android Studio, Gemini Enterprise / Gemini Enterprise Agent Platform |