AI Trend Notifier
EN

$ diff gpt-image-2-5-flare gemini-3-8-flash

GPT-Image-2.5 Flare vs Gemini 3.8 Flash

Values come from GPT-Image-2.5 Flare and Gemini 3.8 Flash, where each is cited to its source. This page states no benchmark result and ranks neither model — it puts two published specifications next to each other. Where a lab has not published a figure, the row says so rather than guessing.

What actually differs

Input price
Gemini 3.8 Flash at $0.75/M against $30/M — 40.0× cheaper to feed.
Output price
GPT-Image-2.5 Flare at $2/M against $3.75/M — 1.9× cheaper to generate. Output dominates the bill on most agentic workloads, where the model writes far more than it reads.
Recency
GPT-Image-2.5 Flare shipped 6 days after Gemini 3.8 Flash (2026-09-08 vs 2026-09-02).

Full spec

AttributeGPT-Image-2.5 FlareGemini 3.8 Flash
DeveloperOpenAIGoogle DeepMind
Released2026-09-082026-09-02
Context windownot recorded1,048,576 tokens (65,536 max output)
Pricingimage input $8.00/M tokens ($2.00/M cached) · image output $30.00/M tokens · text input $5.00/M tokens ($1.25/M cached)$0.75/M input · $3.75/M output (introductory, through 2026-12-31) · $1.50/M · $7.50/M from 2027-01-01
Licenseproprietaryproprietary
AvailabilityOpenAI APIGemini API, Google AI Studio, Antigravity, Android Studio, Gemini Enterprise / Gemini Enterprise Agent Platform

How these pages are produced

← all comparisons