AI Trend Notifier
EN

$ diff gemini-3-8-flash glm-5-3-flash

Gemini 3.8 Flash vs GLM-5.3-Flash

Values come from Gemini 3.8 Flash and GLM-5.3-Flash, where each is cited to its source. This page states no benchmark result and ranks neither model — it puts two published specifications next to each other. Where a lab has not published a figure, the row says so rather than guessing.

What actually differs

Context window
Identical — both accept 1.0M tokens, so context length is not a reason to pick either.
Input price
GLM-5.3-Flash at $0.15/M against $0.75/M — 5.0× cheaper to feed. Standard rates: one of these labs also quotes a lower cached-input tier, which applies only when a prefix is reused — see the full spec below.
Output price
GLM-5.3-Flash at $0.5/M against $3.75/M — 7.5× cheaper to generate. Output dominates the bill on most agentic workloads, where the model writes far more than it reads.
Weights
GLM-5.3-Flash publishes weights (MIT); Gemini 3.8 Flash is API-only. That decides self-hosting, air-gapped deployment and fine-tuning before any capability question does.
Recency
Gemini 3.8 Flash shipped 7 days after GLM-5.3-Flash (2026-09-02 vs 2026-08-26).

Full spec

AttributeGemini 3.8 FlashGLM-5.3-Flash
DeveloperGoogle DeepMindZ.ai
Released2026-09-022026-08-26
Context window1,048,576 tokens (65,536 max output)1,048,576 (1M)
Pricing$0.75/M input · $3.75/M output (introductory, through 2026-12-31) · $1.50/M · $7.50/M from 2027-01-01$0.15/M input · $0.03/M cached input · $0.50/M output
LicenseproprietaryMIT
AvailabilityGemini API, Google AI Studio, Antigravity, Android Studio, Gemini Enterprise / Gemini Enterprise Agent PlatformHugging Face (open weights), Z.ai API

How these pages are produced

← all comparisons