AI Trend Notifier
EN

$ diff deepseek-v4-pro-0813 grok-4-6

DeepSeek V4-Pro-0813 vs Grok 4.6

Values come from DeepSeek V4-Pro-0813 and Grok 4.6, where each is cited to its source. This page states no benchmark result and ranks neither model — it puts two published specifications next to each other. Where a lab has not published a figure, the row says so rather than guessing.

What actually differs

Context window
DeepSeek V4-Pro-0813 takes 1.0M against 500K — 2.1× more room in a single request.
Input price
DeepSeek V4-Pro-0813 at $0.66/M against $2/M — 3.0× cheaper to feed. Standard rates: one of these labs also quotes a lower cached-input tier, which applies only when a prefix is reused — see the full spec below.
Output price
DeepSeek V4-Pro-0813 at $1.98/M against $6/M — 3.0× cheaper to generate. Output dominates the bill on most agentic workloads, where the model writes far more than it reads.
Weights
DeepSeek V4-Pro-0813 publishes weights (MIT (open-weight, as reported)); Grok 4.6 is API-only. That decides self-hosting, air-gapped deployment and fine-tuning before any capability question does.
Recency
DeepSeek V4-Pro-0813 shipped 6 days after Grok 4.6 (2026-08-13 vs 2026-08-07).

Full spec

AttributeDeepSeek V4-Pro-0813Grok 4.6
DeveloperDeepSeekxAI
Released2026-08-132026-08-07
Context window1,048,576 (1M) — 384K max output500,000 tokens
Pricing$0.66/M input (cache miss) · $1.98/M output off-peak; $1.32 · $3.96 at peak — see Pricing$2/M input · $6/M output; a request reaching 200K tokens re-prices in full at $4.00/M input · $1.00/M cached input · $12.00/M output
LicenseMIT (open-weight, as reported)proprietary
AvailabilityDeepSeek API (Responses format, Codex-adapted), Hugging Face (`deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813`)API

How these pages are produced

← all comparisons