AI Trend Notifier
EN한

$ diff mistral-large-4 deepseek-v4-1-flash

Mistral Large 4 vs DeepSeek V4.1-Flash

Values come from Mistral Large 4 and DeepSeek V4.1-Flash, where each is cited to its source. This page states no benchmark result and ranks neither model — it puts two published specifications next to each other. Where a lab has not published a figure, the row says so rather than guessing.

What actually differs

Context window
Identical — both accept 1M tokens, so context length is not a reason to pick either.
Input price
DeepSeek V4.1-Flash at $0.15/M against $1.36/M — 9.1× cheaper to feed. Standard rates: one of these labs also quotes a lower cached-input tier, which applies only when a prefix is reused — see the full spec below.
Output price
DeepSeek V4.1-Flash at $0.6/M against $4.18/M — 7.0× cheaper to generate. Output dominates the bill on most agentic workloads, where the model writes far more than it reads.
Recency
Mistral Large 4 shipped 26 days after DeepSeek V4.1-Flash (2026-10-06 vs 2026-09-10).

Full spec

AttributeMistral Large 4DeepSeek V4.1-Flash
DeveloperMistral AIDeepSeek
Released2026-10-062026-09-10
Context window1M1,000,000
Pricing$1.36/M input · $4.18/M output (announcement)$0.15/M input (cache miss) · $0.003/M input (cache hit) · $0.60/M output, off-peak; peak rates double — see Pricing
Licensenot recordedMIT (open-weight)
AvailabilityMistral Studio API preview; weights promised by end of October 2026DeepSeek API, Hugging Face (`deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash`)

How these pages are produced

← all comparisons