AI Trend Notifier
EN

$ diff deepseek-v4-1-flash glm-5-3-flash

DeepSeek V4.1-Flash vs GLM-5.3-Flash

Values come from DeepSeek V4.1-Flash and GLM-5.3-Flash, where each is cited to its source. This page states no benchmark result and ranks neither model — it puts two published specifications next to each other. Where a lab has not published a figure, the row says so rather than guessing.

What actually differs

Context window
GLM-5.3-Flash takes 1.0M against 1M — modestly more room in a single request.
Output price
GLM-5.3-Flash at $0.5/M against $0.6/M — 1.2× cheaper to generate. Output dominates the bill on most agentic workloads, where the model writes far more than it reads.
Weights
Both publish weights — DeepSeek V4.1-Flash under MIT (open-weight), GLM-5.3-Flash under MIT. Check the licences rather than assuming they permit the same commercial use.
Recency
DeepSeek V4.1-Flash shipped 15 days after GLM-5.3-Flash (2026-09-10 vs 2026-08-26).

Full spec

AttributeDeepSeek V4.1-FlashGLM-5.3-Flash
DeveloperDeepSeekZ.ai
Released2026-09-102026-08-26
Context window1,000,0001,048,576 (1M)
Pricing$0.15/M input (cache miss) · $0.003/M input (cache hit) · $0.60/M output, off-peak; peak rates double — see Pricing$0.15/M input · $0.03/M cached input · $0.50/M output
LicenseMIT (open-weight)MIT
AvailabilityDeepSeek API, Hugging Face (`deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash`)Hugging Face (open weights), Z.ai API

How these pages are produced

← all comparisons