AI Trend Notifier
EN

$ diff deepseek-v4-1-flash gemini-3-8-flash

DeepSeek V4.1-Flash vs Gemini 3.8 Flash

Values come from DeepSeek V4.1-Flash and Gemini 3.8 Flash, where each is cited to its source. This page states no benchmark result and ranks neither model — it puts two published specifications next to each other. Where a lab has not published a figure, the row says so rather than guessing.

What actually differs

Context window
Gemini 3.8 Flash takes 1.0M against 1M — modestly more room in a single request.
Input price
DeepSeek V4.1-Flash at $0.15/M against $0.75/M — 5.0× cheaper to feed. Standard rates: one of these labs also quotes a lower cached-input tier, which applies only when a prefix is reused — see the full spec below.
Output price
DeepSeek V4.1-Flash at $0.6/M against $3.75/M — 6.3× cheaper to generate. Output dominates the bill on most agentic workloads, where the model writes far more than it reads.
Weights
DeepSeek V4.1-Flash publishes weights (MIT (open-weight)); Gemini 3.8 Flash is API-only. That decides self-hosting, air-gapped deployment and fine-tuning before any capability question does.
Recency
DeepSeek V4.1-Flash shipped 8 days after Gemini 3.8 Flash (2026-09-10 vs 2026-09-02).

Full spec

AttributeDeepSeek V4.1-FlashGemini 3.8 Flash
DeveloperDeepSeekGoogle DeepMind
Released2026-09-102026-09-02
Context window1,000,0001,048,576 tokens (65,536 max output)
Pricing$0.15/M input (cache miss) · $0.003/M input (cache hit) · $0.60/M output, off-peak; peak rates double — see Pricing$0.75/M input · $3.75/M output (introductory, through 2026-12-31) · $1.50/M · $7.50/M from 2027-01-01
LicenseMIT (open-weight)proprietary
AvailabilityDeepSeek API, Hugging Face (`deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash`)Gemini API, Google AI Studio, Antigravity, Android Studio, Gemini Enterprise / Gemini Enterprise Agent Platform

How these pages are produced

← all comparisons