$ diff deepseek-v4-pro-0813 claude-opus-5
DeepSeek V4-Pro-0813 vs Claude Opus 5
Values come from DeepSeek V4-Pro-0813 and Claude Opus 5, where each is cited to its source. This page states no benchmark result and ranks neither model — it puts two published specifications next to each other. Where a lab has not published a figure, the row says so rather than guessing.
DeepSeekDeepSeek V4-Pro-0813
- context
- 1.0M
- weights
- open
- $/M in
- $0.66
- $/M out
- $1.98
- context
- 1M
- weights
- closed
- $/M in
- $5
- $/M out
- $25
What actually differs
- Context window
- DeepSeek V4-Pro-0813 takes 1.0M against 1M — modestly more room in a single request.
- Input price
- DeepSeek V4-Pro-0813 at $0.66/M against $5/M — 7.6× cheaper to feed.
- Output price
- DeepSeek V4-Pro-0813 at $1.98/M against $25/M — 12.6× cheaper to generate. Output dominates the bill on most agentic workloads, where the model writes far more than it reads.
- Weights
- DeepSeek V4-Pro-0813 publishes weights (MIT (open-weight, as reported)); Claude Opus 5 is API-only. That decides self-hosting, air-gapped deployment and fine-tuning before any capability question does.
- Recency
- DeepSeek V4-Pro-0813 shipped 20 days after Claude Opus 5 (2026-08-13 vs 2026-07-24).
Full spec
| Attribute | DeepSeek V4-Pro-0813 | Claude Opus 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | DeepSeek | Anthropic |
| Released | 2026-08-13 | 2026-07-24 |
| Context window | 1,048,576 (1M) — 384K max output | 1M tokens |
| Pricing | $0.66/M input (cache miss) · $1.98/M output off-peak; $1.32 · $3.96 at peak — see Pricing | $5/M input · $25/M output (standard); $10/M · $50/M (Fast mode, research preview) |
| License | MIT (open-weight, as reported) | proprietary |
| Availability | DeepSeek API (Responses format, Codex-adapted), Hugging Face (`deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813`) | Claude.ai, API (`claude-opus-5`), Bedrock (`anthropic.claude-opus-53`), Vertex AI, Microsoft Foundry, Claude Code, Cowork |