AI Trend Notifier
EN

$ diff claude-opus-5-5 gemini-3-8-flash

Claude Opus 5.5 vs Gemini 3.8 Flash

Values come from Claude Opus 5.5 and Gemini 3.8 Flash, where each is cited to its source. This page states no benchmark result and ranks neither model — it puts two published specifications next to each other. Where a lab has not published a figure, the row says so rather than guessing.

What actually differs

Context window
Gemini 3.8 Flash takes 1.0M against 1M — modestly more room in a single request.
Input price
Gemini 3.8 Flash at $0.75/M against $4/M — 5.3× cheaper to feed.
Output price
Gemini 3.8 Flash at $3.75/M against $20/M — 5.3× cheaper to generate. Output dominates the bill on most agentic workloads, where the model writes far more than it reads.
Recency
Claude Opus 5.5 shipped 20 days after Gemini 3.8 Flash (2026-09-22 vs 2026-09-02).

Full spec

AttributeClaude Opus 5.5Gemini 3.8 Flash
DeveloperAnthropicGoogle DeepMind
Released2026-09-222026-09-02
Context window1M tokens1,048,576 tokens (65,536 max output)
Pricing$4/M input · $20/M output · cache reads $0.20/M · cache writes $5/M$0.75/M input · $3.75/M output (introductory, through 2026-12-31) · $1.50/M · $7.50/M from 2027-01-01
Licenseproprietary (API-only; no weight release)proprietary
AvailabilityClaude apps, Claude Code, Claude API as `claude-opus-5-5`, Amazon Bedrock, Google Cloud Vertex AI, Microsoft FoundryGemini API, Google AI Studio, Antigravity, Android Studio, Gemini Enterprise / Gemini Enterprise Agent Platform

How these pages are produced

← all comparisons