AI Trend Notifier
EN한

$ diff beam-1-0 mimo-v2-6-pro

Beam 1.0 vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro

Values come from Beam 1.0 and MiMo-V2.6-Pro, where each is cited to its source. This page states no benchmark result and ranks neither model — it puts two published specifications next to each other. Where a lab has not published a figure, the row says so rather than guessing.

What actually differs

Context window
Identical — both accept 1M tokens, so context length is not a reason to pick either.
Weights
Both publish weights — Beam 1.0 under Apache 2.0, MiMo-V2.6-Pro under MIT (open weights). Check the licences rather than assuming they permit the same commercial use.
Recency
Beam 1.0 shipped 24 days after MiMo-V2.6-Pro (2026-10-16 vs 2026-09-22).

Full spec

AttributeBeam 1.0MiMo-V2.6-Pro
DeveloperReflectionXiaomi
Released2026-10-162026-09-22
Context window1M tokens1M tokens
Pricingnot recordedno vendor list price — weights are MIT and self-hostable; routed providers reported at $0.435/M input · $0.87/M output
LicenseApache 2.0MIT (open weights)
AvailabilityOpen weights; Reflection API public beta; partner endpointsHugging Face as `XiaomiMiMo/MiMo-V2.6-Pro-RL`; hosted via third-party routers

How these pages are produced

← all comparisons